May 28, 2026
OGC Nice v FC Metz - Ligue 1 McDonald's 2025/2026

Illustration during the Ligue 1 McDonald's match between Nice and Metz at Allianz Riviera on May 17, 2026 in Nice, France. (Photo by Loic Baratoux/FEP/Icon Sport)

In a decision that has left football fans and club officials in Nice reeling, the French Football Federation (FFF) has upheld a stadium ban against OGC Nice for their upcoming Ligue 1 playoff rematch against AS Saint-Étienne. The sanction, confirmed by the FFF’s Superior Appeals Commission, means the crucial fixture at the Allianz Riviera will be played behind closed doors, with no spectators allowed.

The FFF’s decision follows incidents that marred Nice’s final league match of the season against FC Metz on May 17. Initially, the club faced a punishment of two closed-door matches and one with a suspended ban, along with a suspended point deduction for the 2026/27 season. However, the appeals body has now enforced a stricter penalty: two full closed-door matches and a suspended one-point deduction for next season.

Club condemns sanction as ‘particularly harsh’

OGC Nice has expressed strong disapproval of the ruling, calling the decision an “aberration” in an official statement. The club highlighted its full cooperation with authorities and the positive feedback received from LFP delegates who monitored the match against Metz. Despite these points, the federation has chosen to impose what the club describes as an “extremely severe” penalty.

“Playing this decisive playoff match behind closed doors is already a heavy sanction,” the statement read. “But depriving the entire stadium of such a pivotal moment is, in our view, an exceptionally harsh measure—both in sporting and emotional terms.”

A legal battle looms

Facing what it considers an unjust penalty, Nice has announced its intention to pursue all legal avenues. The club will first request a conciliation process through the French National Olympic and Sports Committee. Should this fail, it will not hesitate to take the matter to the Administrative Court to defend its rights and challenge the ruling.