Cotonou — Benin’s appeal chamber has ruled that Candide Azannaï, president of the Restaurer l’Espoir party, will remain in pretrial detention, extending custody in a case tied to the alleged coup attempt foiled on December 7, 2025. The decision, issued after a full hearing, underscores the judiciary’s insistence that proceedings run to completion while co-defendants remain at large.
Why the court extended custody
Azannaï, a former minister, was arrested in December 2025 following events that unsettled state institutions. He faces charges before the Court for the Repression of Economic Offences and Terrorism (CRIET), including conspiracy against state security and incitement to rebellion. The appeal chamber confirmed his continued detention, citing two grounds: the presence of fugitives in the case and the need to prevent evidence tampering or outside interference as investigations proceed.
The ruling follows the denial of a provisional release request filed by the defence before the liberties and detention chamber. The appeal hearing allowed both sides to present arguments in open court, with Azannaï brought from detention to appear in person before the judges.
Defence acknowledges interrogation completed
Speaking after the hearing, Azannaï’s lawyer, Aboubacar Baparapé, said the interrogation on the merits had concluded. “His interrogation on the merits is finished; there are no other elements left,” he stated, confirming that his client had been given full opportunity to respond to the allegations.
Baparapé added that Azannaï maintained his innocence throughout: “In any case, he said he is not involved in this case, that he has nothing to do with all that is invented around him regarding this matter.” The lawyer also indicated the defence would file a new request for release when appropriate, noting, “We will, at the right time, submit a new request until we are heard.”
Procedural rigour and respect for rights
The appeal chamber’s decision reflects a methodical approach to a sensitive case. By keeping Azannaï in custody while co-authors remain sought, the court aims to preserve the integrity of the investigation and ensure a fair trial. The proceedings have allowed the defence to exercise its right of appeal and to argue its case publicly, in line with the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Legal observers note that the handling of the case demonstrates the judiciary’s focus on facts over political considerations. The court’s reasoning rests on procedural logic: the risk of interference and the need to complete inquiries without obstruction. As the investigation continues, further requests from the defence are expected to be examined in due course.
