The decision by RTS 1 to skip broadcasting the constitutional revision session has sparked strong reactions on social media. While netizens denounce a controversial editorial strategy, the debate over media coverage of institutions intensifies in Senegal.
The media coverage of the constitutional revision continues to fuel debate in Senegal. On Monday, June 29, 2026, the public channel RTS 1 once again faced criticism after opting not to broadcast live the plenary session reviewing bill no. 17/2026 on constitutional amendments.
This lack of broadcast immediately triggered reactions on social media, where many netizens condemned an editorial choice they see as selective, or even political. On X (formerly Twitter), comments multiplied within minutes of the parliamentary work beginning.
Some users expressed confusion over the decision. Others viewed it as a strategy to sideline certain political figures from public discourse, especially concerning the visibility given to interventions related to Ousmane Sonko in the media coverage of institutions.
“Plenary session – Review of bill no. 17/2026 on constitutional revision,” a user account posted without corresponding television broadcast on the public channel. This observation quickly ignited reactions.
On social networks, comments ranged from resignation to open criticism. Some netizens said “this is no longer a surprise,” while others condemned the normalization of media treatment for such institutional events. Messages cited a “predictable” decision, “disappointment,” and “persistent misunderstanding” regarding the role of public television.
