Insecurity is increasingly encroaching upon the Nigerien capital. On 26 June 2026, the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM) released a video in the Zarma language featuring spokesman Abdulmajid al-Ansari delivering a deeply alarming message to the people of Niamey.
The group claims it does not target civilians, but accuses part of the population of having cooperated with the Nigerien Defence and Security Forces during the 18 June 2026 attack on Niamey Airport. Based on this accusation, JNIM explicitly threatens residents who venture near the capital, asserting its capacity to strike within Niamey itself. It also states that previous operations were merely a prelude to what it describes as “far more significant” actions.
This statement marks a troubling shift in the group’s communication strategy. By equating civilians with alleged military supporters, JNIM fosters an ambiguity that could heighten fear among the populace. Even when an armed group denies targeting civilians, singling them out as potential collaborators significantly increases their vulnerability to violence and intimidation.
These remarks come amid a surge in attacks across Niger in recent years, despite changes in security policy and the reinforcement of military partnerships. They also demonstrate the jihadist groups’ intent to exert psychological pressure on communities by spreading messages meant to instil fear, undermine trust in authorities, and restrict movement in certain areas.
Beyond their military implications, these threats serve as a tool of psychological warfare. They aim to foster a permanent climate of insecurity, discourage any cooperation between citizens and security forces, and prove that armed groups seek to extend their influence right to the capital’s doorstep. In response to such communications, the authorities face both security and informational challenges: protecting civilians while preventing armed groups’ propaganda from amplifying the very fear they intend to create.
